Instagram Attempting Fentanyl Crackdown

Did you know that one of the most common way drug dealers find new clients nowadays is through social media? Facebook and Instagram aren’t all sunshine and rainbows. In fact, Instagram has still been very lax in cracking down on drug-related posts.

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, along with his company recently began the crackdown on these opioid-related posts. Instagram, who is also owned by Facebook, has been one of the largest purveyors of illegal substances. Zuckerberg (and Facebook proper), have been recently notorious for saying they will do something about problems or issues, apologizing, but NOT taking responsibility, then doing nothing.

zucked.jpg

Let’s take a step back a moment to talk about the opioid crisis, and why the fact that Facebook is doing little to nothing about it, is a gigantic issue:

Overdose deaths due to substance abuse has continued to increase. If we go back less than 10 years, to 2010, there were 21,089 deaths across the nation. It doubled to 42,249 in 2016. Now, after 2017, which saw numbers reach over 70,000 fatalities according to numbers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we could be looking at numbers nearing 80,000 for 2018.

800px-US_timeline._Deaths_involving_other_synthetic_opioids,_predominately_Fentanyl.jpg

A large amount of this credit has to be put on Fentanyl, where the deaths rates in only 2013 were around 3,000 overdose deaths, now hover around 28,000.

Before we dive in to how illicit substances, especially Fentanyl, have become widely sold over social networking sites, especially that of Instagram, what is Fentanyl and where did it come from?

2mg of Fentanyl, a lethal dose

2mg of Fentanyl, a lethal dose

Fentanyl, to explain it as straightforward as possible, is a synthetic opioid that is 80-100 times stronger than morphine. Its primary use was in pain management, for people with severe pain like cancer patients. Due to its short-term high and euphoric brain reaction causation, the drug has been, more and more often, cut with heroin. Dealers will frequently add Fentanyl to heroin, increasing its potency, while saving money on the heroin, instead opting for the cheaper, more intense Fentanyl. Taking less than 5 minutes to reach your blood stream and your brain, the euphoria is almost instantaneous. And due to its quick half-life, the end-users are left desiring more. Plus, when cut with heroin, it combines the two drugs to produce a brand new high. The issue that these victims of overdose are encountering is that they are shooting heroin that contains more Fentanyl than either their body can handle or more than any body can handle. It is said that 2mg of Fentanyl is a lethal dose. It is also the way Prince died, same with Tom Petty’s death, as well as the death of Mac Miller. Should I go on?

So there’s Fentanyl - extremely dangerous and deadly. Now let’s move on to the main idea behind this post: What Instagram is, or isn’t, doing.

Instagram FINALLY decided to start removing/blocking some posts containing specific hashtags. There was, no joke, the hashtag #XanaxForSale floating around Instagram. Sellers weren’t even trying to be discrete. As this crackdown happened, dealers just shifted their hashtags oh-so slightly to those that were unblocked. It became #XanaxLife and #Oxycontins. Again, creative, right? Not really. But they didn’t need to be creative! It was just that easy for them. It’s like posting an advertisement in the local newspaper for drugs, and rarely ever getting caught.

Instagram-Drug-Searches.png

When we analyze Instagram, and especially Facebook’s, recent crackdown of speech and rhetoric, it was a huge surprise to see that they didn’t take the time to enforce their drug hashtags. Although I believe that part of the poor timing is due to the face that Facebook has been pretty swamped with Congressional Hearings regarding Russia placing advertising on the webpages to influence elections, they have a large enough company that it shouldn’t make a difference. When you think about it though, this issue that over 70,000 people are overdosing on drugs each year, should be of paramount importance to Facebook and Instagram. Are you listening, Zuckerberg?!?!

The majority, 80% worth, of the United State’s Fentanyl is currently be routed from Mexico through San Diego, California before dispersing throughout the U.S., thanks to the Sinaloa Cartel. Another big push is through Texas, although San Diego has been universally the popular route.

From San Diego, CA, the drug is in the perfect location. At the base of Interstate-5, which runs from Chula Vista, which sits right at the US-Mexico border, and runs through San Diego, Los Angeles, Sacramento (and only a short jump to the bay-area), Salem, Portland, Tacoma, Olympia, Seattle, and onward to Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Traffickers can also take Interstate-10 to El Paso, TX, then before long, you reach Eastern Texas. Texas is an ideal location for drugs, with the perfect highways going north to Chicago, or northeast to the Baltimore, New York, Boston, Washington DC areas, or that can simply stay east, making their way to Atlanta and Florida, and ultimately, the notorious I-95. This goes for weapons as well, as they hit the I-95, also denoted the “Iron Pipeline” by the ATF, and the connecting highways. From there, they hit all of the metropolitan cities on the east coast where they are used to kill gang members, children, innocent bystanders, and police. The Iron Pipeline southern-most point is Miami, then runs directly up the east coast, hitting Washington DC, Baltimore, New York City, Philadelphia, and again, all the way through the northern-most state, Maine, and into Canada. The cartel, or drug runners, have also been branching off in southern New York, and taking I-87 through Albany, NY up to Canada where they reach Montreal. From there, it’s a short trip west to Ottawa or east to Montreal City.

I think I’ve made my point.

Interstate-87 in northern Vermont, before crossing into Canada

Interstate-87 in northern Vermont, before crossing into Canada

So the important question - how to we deal with this drug problem?

I think we can all agree that the War on Drugs of the Nixon-era didn’t work, right? Even though Nixon said, in a press conference, that drugs are "public enemy number one", he is partially right, but as a fix, the War on Drugs was a complete disaster. First, it quadrupled the prison population. I always find it interesting when people who agreed with the War on Drugs are upset when a violent offender gets released from prison on bail within 24 hours. It’s because the prisons are full of non-violent offenders who are serving lengthy or even life sentences. And these prisons weren’t just full of every age and race, it was and is disproportionally comprised of minorities. It became a prisons-for-profit that cost taxpayers close to a trillion dollars.

“Well, what about the violence of the drug trade?” Good question! Yes, drug trafficking is inherently violent. Why? It’s drug prohibition. People were quite violent during the alcohol prohibition. Let’s take a different legal drug…nicotine. Have you seen nicotine CEO’s shooting each other in the streets? No, you have not.

I think there is a good reason that makes sense to me. The CEO of Marlboro, Clifford B. Fleet, is an incredibly rich, white male and his product is legal. And don’t for a second think I’m saying that the head boss of the Sinaloa Cartel isn’t rich, but he isn’t white, and he deals with illegal drugs.. Same with the majority of those arrested in the War on Drugs. As the amazing fiction author Don Winslow put it, “The War on Drugs has largely been a war on people of color.” If (some of) these drugs were legalized, it would push the cartel back into Mexico.

I can hear it already. “But then it will flood the streets and users won’t try to stop?” Yeah, maybe, but they aren’t trying to stop now. Take Portugal for instance. In the late 1990s, the country was plagued by addiction, the HIV crisis was soaring, and the prisons were packed. Sound familiar? Well, the made some changes. They decriminalized it. Now keep in mind, decriminalization is not legalization. Drug offenders may still be penalized, but the idea is to redirect enforcement resources and prevent flooding prisons with non-violent offenders. Drugs are still illegal there, but anyone carrying less than 10 days’ worth of illicit substances will have their supply confiscated. They get an assessment with a social worker, psychologist, and lawyer. Their consequences usually range from a few days’ worth of community service to a ban on visiting venues in which the person is known to purchase or obtain or use drugs. Even high-risk patients can receive an invitation to undergo treatment. Rehab is voluntary in all but exceptional situations.

Portugal’s HIV rates among intravenous drug users have dropped from 1,482 in 2000 to only 40 in 2014. They have seen cocaine use per capita approximately one-tenth of Spains and only one-fifth that of France. According to European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD):

Maybe if we at least attempted to adopt something similar, we may see some changes.

Another factor in this so-called new “War on Drugs” is that African-Americans make substantially less than white males. According to The Economist, “…Much of this difference is due to mass incarceration.” Along with this, it is proven that there is a direct link between poverty and prison, which isn’t surprising. If I was flat broke, I might be tempted to steal food, or to deal drugs to make some money to feed myself or my family. Along with poverty comes either homelessness or living in some of the worst buildings, flophouses, and locations in the country.

In a fantastic, non-fiction book by Matthew Desmond titled Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City, a brilliant line arises. “Every condition exists,” Martin Luther King Jr. once wrote, “simply because someone profits by its existence. This economic exploitation is crystallized in the slum.” Exploitation. Now, there’s a word that has been scrubbed out of the poverty debate.”

I believe that before we start beefing up border security, we need to take a better look at what’s happening in America. A wall won’t stop drug traffickers, and I’m assuming that’s it’s supposed use. Tunnels, airplanes, and boats. Need further evidence? These three links appeared in the first page of an internet search for “drug traffic mexico”:

A tunnel that ran from an abandoned KFC in California under the border into Mexico

A tunnel that ran from an abandoned KFC in California under the border into Mexico

A wall doesn’t stop tunnels, last I checked. Even if you agree with the wall, didn’t Trump say Mexico was going to pay for it? That was the crux of his election campaign. Now, he’s asking for $5 billion dollars to fund the wall, or he will shut down the government. Did I miss something? Regardless of where you sit on the political aisle, does this make sense to you? Even though I’m not sure why I’m surprised. When was the last time a President made a campaign promise and actually follow through with it? They’ll say whatever gets them elected.

Alright, I think I deviated far enough away from the drug problem. I just hope I made my point clear, that the people doing drugs should not be our enemy. They’re our fellow citizens, fellow human beings, and they deserve assistance. Step off of the pedestal for a few minutes to think about how difficult life would be addiction to a substance. Many people say that they don’t want their tax money to go to building homeless shelters or actually housing addicts for them to go through rehabilitation. If you’re one of these people, I sincerely am curious at your proposed solution? Leave them in the streets craving drugs, hustling for quarters, while we step over them on our way to where we want to go? Because then people complain that there are too many homeless on their streets.

Again, regardless of where your politics fall, in the final days of Obama’s Administration, we started to see a gravitation to a more sensible drug policy, which allows clemency for nonviolent offenders serving these incredibly long prison terms, a push to end mandatory minimum prison sentences, a less aggressive stance on the enforcing of the marijuana laws, which former Attorney General Jeff Sessions tried desperately to dismantle, and the abolition of prison privatization on the federal level.

As you can see, I am very passionate about this country’s current drug problem. People are overdosing everyday, in every town, and it’s about time we recognized this problem and attempted to come to some sort of resolution.

If poverty persists in America, it is not for lack of resources.
— Matthew Desmond, Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City
Facebook stock on 12/20/2018 at 10:41AM EST

Facebook stock on 12/20/2018 at 10:41AM EST

Facebook (and their company Instagram) are becoming a big issue when it comes to drug trafficking. With big money comes drugs. Either Facebook needs to crackdown on their drug trafficking posts on both companies, or we will only see this issue get worse. Also, their inability to help mitigate fake profiles is astounding, and this should definitely not be the case for a business of this size. Facebook, because of its size, should feel obligated to do so. This goes for Instagram as well. Unfortunately, for all of us who actually think this is problematic, Facebook is public traded. This means that it’s number one obligation is to its shareholders. That’s it - make money. On the bright side, with all of Facebooks shortcomings, especially as of late, we have start to see their stock begin to drop, as Facebook has been sharing more of our data with third-party companies. Just like how they gave user’s private Facebook messages to Netflix and Spotify, even though Mark Zuckerberg claims that it was done with user consent. We’ve been zucked again. I only pray that this will make them realize the disaster they have become. Their lack of transparency over their entire existence has been abysmal. Take for instance their Facebook iOS application updates. They just use the same template for every update description.

We've been zucked again!

facepalm.gif

I’ve been contemplating deleting my Facebook for some time. I’m tired of my data being sold, their complete and utter lack of any kind of monitoring of enforcement. Add in their nonexistent transparency with what is being done with user data. they’re about to become the open-source Equifax. If things don’t change in the ensuing months, I will most likely be calling it quits ✌️.

Corvallis Scams

Breaking down the scams occurring in my backyard

Most people think of a hacker or scammer as someone in a black hoodie, sitting in a dark room, trying to steal your information. That's not the case.

So this following list is a record of all of the scams that have occurred in the Benton County area, and the more I see it, the more it frustrates me. No one is talking about this. No one is reporting on it. No one even acknowledges it. Well, I'm going to do it now.

3090392251_911be4dfaf_z.jpg

Corvallis,_Oregon_-_Benton_County_Courthouse_01.jpg

I encourage you to read a few of these scams, and don't feel like you need to read them all, but when you've had your fill, you can scroll to my breakdown. Get ready to scroll, because this list is long. I will give you some ways to avoid scams, and some ways to immediately notice you are attempting to be scammed.

Corvallis (Oregon) Police Department & Benton County Sheriff's Office Police Log Reports (information gathered from The Corvallis Gazette Times)

July 30, 2018
SCAM: 9:50 a.m., [address omitted]
A trooper was made aware of a fraud attempt targeting OSU students through their email accounts. The email offered a job in New Jersey and requested students reply with personal information. Students were notified of the phishing email.

July 29, 2018
SCAM: [address omitted]
A man reported that he had sent $700 via Walmart to Ohio for a deposit on a rental home but that it turned out to be a scam. 

July 26, 2018
THEFT: 7:37 p.m., [address omitted]
A man told police he was contacted by someone purporting to be a Chinese official and who informed him he needed to transfer $10,000 into an account at the Bank of China to ensure it was "clean" because it could have been involved in an "economic crime." The man transferred the money and then realized he may have been scammed. Police told the man to cancel the wire transfer and to report the incident to authorities in China.

July 21, 2018
SCAM: [address omitted]
A Philomath resident reported that she sold an iPad through a buyer on Facebook and shipped it without receiving payment. She received what she had thought was an email stating that the payment had been credited to her account, but she learned that it was a fraudulent email.

July 17, 2018
SCAM: 11:08 a.m.,[address omitted]
A woman told police she listed two Country Music Festival tickets on Craigslist for $400 and received an offer out of California for $1,300 if she’d send $960 via Western Union to someone in New York. The woman said she did this and was later informed by her bank that the check she deposited was fraudulent.

July 11, 2018
SCAM: 1:58 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman told deputies she met a man on Facebook a few months ago and the man told her he was in a hospital in South Carolina and needed money for surgery. The woman said she gave the man $1,000 in Amazon gift cards and the man asked for $2,000 more. The woman wanted to verify she was scammed and deputies told her she was. They discussed ways to prevent the incident from occurring again.

July 10, 2018
SCAM: 10:03 a.m., [address omitted]
A woman told troopers she received an email that contained a check for $928. The woman was instructed to cash the check and buy something for the suspect and keep the change. The woman deposited the check and spent the money but did not send any money to the suspect. The bank then informed the woman the check was fraudulent and requested the money back.

July 6, 2018
SCAM: 12:53 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman told police she paid $299.99 to Microsoft for a subscription to keep her computer clean of viruses. The woman later realized it was a scam and canceled the check before it reached the recipient. Police think the scam involved international perpetrators and discontinued the investigation.

June 30, 2018
SCAM: [address omitted]
A person reported they received a phone call from someone claiming to be a Benton County Sheriff’s Office deputy. The caller told the person they had missed jury duty and needed to pay $3,000. The person bought $1,000 in Google Play cards and sent photos of the cards to the caller.

June 30, 2018
SCAM: 6 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported that some Chinese nationals called her posing as members of the Chinese consulate in San Francisco. They said that Shanghai police officers wanted to speak to the woman about some bank accounts opened in her name through the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. The woman spoke with alleged Shanghai police officers, who stated she would be arrested if she could not prove she did not open the accounts. They convinced her to wire $90,000 to a bank account in Hong Kong with a promise of it being returned once her innocence was proven. The woman later realized the call was fraudulent.

June 19, 2018
SCAM: 11:23 a.m., [address omitted]
A man reported he had met a person online who identified herself as Ingrid Nugent and they had entered into a relationship. The man said $4,500 was deposited into his account by a person Nugent said was her attorney. Nugent then asked the man to send $4,064 by iTunes gift cards and money gram to Nigeria, which he did. The check deposited into the man’s account subsequently was declined.

June 15, 2018
SCAM: [address omitted]
A woman reported she had been having problems posting a video to Facebook, so she Googled a support number for Facebook. She called a number she found and was told her problem could be fixed if she provided $700 worth of gift cards. The woman bought the gift cards and provided the card's numbers to someone she believed to be a Facebook support employee. After providing the gift card information, the woman’s problem was resolved. The woman was informed by the person she called that if she provided another $300 worth of gift card information she would be reimbursed her money. She started to believe she was scammed and called police.

June 12, 2018
SCAM: 7:23 p.m., [address omitted]
A man reported he received a call from a person identifying himself as "Deputy Dale Ingram" with the Benton County Sheriff’s Office. The caller said the man had two failure to appear warrants and could pay the fine over the phone or be arrested. The man said he bought two Green Dot cards for $972 and read the numbers to the caller. When the man reported the incident to deputies, they informed him he was the victim of a scam.

June 5, 2018
SCAM: 4:17 p.m., [address omitted]
A man reported he was contacted by someone stating they were from the hospital and told him a Benton County deputy was trying to reach him. The man said he was contacted the following day by someone saying they were Sheriff Ingram with the Benton County Sheriff’s Office and that the man had a warrant for his arrest. The caller told the man he needed to buy two “Money Pak” cards with $494 on each to clear the warrants. The man purchased the cards and gave the caller the identification numbers. The man said he tried calling the number back, but there was no answer. Police tried calling the number but it went to an automated message machine and then the call ended.

May 31, 2018
SCAM: [address omitted]
A man told police he had listed his Microsoft Surface Book online for sale and was contacted by someone named “Yani Pedro” who wanted to purchase it. The man set up payment for the computer through PayPal and mailed the computer to an address in Houston. However, the man never received payment and discovered the email he was sent about PayPal was a scam.

May 15, 2018
SCAM: 4:37 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman told police she received a phone call at work from a woman who claimed to work for the state police. The caller told the woman that she did not file a Form 8886 with the IRS, and they were going to issue a warrant for her arrest. The woman said the caller instructed her to buy 12 gift cards worth $500 a piece. The woman told police she spoke to her bank and gave the caller some of her information, and then went to Wal-Mart to try and buy the gift cards. The woman said she tried twice to buy the gift cards, but her transactions were declined. Police informed her she had been scammed.

May 15, 2018
SCAM: [address omitted]
Police responded to Citizens Bank after a man cashed a fraudulent check. Officers contacted the man, and after he refused to remove his hands from his pockets, they placed him in handcuffs. The man told police he received the check in the mail from a Craigslist ad and was supposed to provide the account information to the sender. The man had deposited the $2,000 check on Monday and withdrew $200 of it. The bank then realized the check was fraudulent. Officers informed the man he had been scammed and released him. He returned to the bank the remaining cash he had from the $200 and was informed his account would be closed.

May 3, 2018
SCAM: 2:08 p.m., [address omitted]
A man told troopers he had received a call from a person posing as a Lane County deputy who claimed he had two warrants for his arrest. The “deputy” told the man he could turn himself in to the sheriff’s office or pay two payments of $489 in Green Dot Moneypak cards. The man sent the money.

April 26, 2018
SCAM: 4:25 p.m., [address omitted]
A man reported his brother, who has dementia, received a phone call from someone claiming to be the county sheriff. The caller claimed the man had missed jury duty and there would be a warrant for his arrest if he did not pay $1,500 via prepaid MoneyPaks. The man stayed on the phone with the caller while he purchased the debit cards and provided the card numbers to the caller over the phone.

April 2, 2018
SCAM: 9:38 a.m., [address omitted]
Police responded to Jimmy John’s for a fraud complaint. An employee told officers a man had called the shop stating he was from the corporate office. The man told the store manager that the shop was being investigated for employee theft and needed to provide the corporate office with $1,000 in gift cards. The manager drove to Fred Meyer, purchased two Visa gift cards and sent the images of the front and back of both cards to the phone number provided by the caller. A different employee had the cards locked so they could not be used.

March 22, 2018
SCAM: 12:10 p.m., [address omitted]
Two people told police they posted an ad on Craigslist seeking housing. They said they were contacted via email by “Larry Dunkin,” who claimed he lived out of state but was renting out 950 SE Powell Ave. The two people agreed to wire $800 via Western Union for the deposit, and Dunkin was to mail the keys. After they wired the money, Dunkin demanded $2,700 for three months’ rent before he would send the keys. The people refused to send the money. Police determined the house was not for rent.

Feb 27, 2018
SCAM: 3:38 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman told police she placed an ad on Craigslist to rent a room. An individual responded and assumed they had been selected as the next tenant and sent a check to the woman for $3,500. When the woman informed the person she would not rent a room to them, the person told her to cash the check and send a money order back in return. The woman knew it was a scam and gave the check to police.

Feb 25, 2018
SCAM: 2 p.m., [address omitted]
A man told police that someone, whom he believed to be a woman in Colorado, added him on Facebook. They video chatted and the man exposed his genitals. The other person then told the man that if he did not pay $500, they would post a video of his genitals online. The suspect wanted a money order sent to the Ivory Coast. The suspect’s Facebook account has since been deactivated.

Feb 21, 2018
SCAM: 4:12 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman said she received a phone call from someone claiming to work for Microsoft. The caller told her that her computer’s virus protection had expired and he could clear her computer of viruses for $499.99. The woman gave the caller her debit card information, as well as remote control of her computer. She later realized it was a scam and noticed a second charge for $512 on her bank statement.

Feb 15, 2018
SCAM: 8:34 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman told police she met a man online who claimed to have lost his wallet while on vacation. The woman sent the man $600 via Western Union. The following day, Western Union’s fraud department called her and said they felt she had fallen for a scam and put a hold on the transaction. The woman then received a call from someone claiming to be an FBI special agent and who said they knew about her involvement with the first man and that she was under investigation as a potential terrorist. The caller told her she needed to send $600 via money order to a judge in Florida, which she did.

Feb 15, 2018
SCAM: 10:30 a.m., [address omitted]
A man reported he sold a computer on Craigslist to “Tonnie Hooker III” for $770. He said he received a check in the mail for $2,300 with instructions to send the rest back via Western Union. The man wired the money from his bank account and then found out the check did not clear, for a total loss of $1,530. The man said “Hooker” had told him he would arrange for someone to pick up the computer in person but the person never arrived.

Feb. 14, 2018
SCAM: 11:38 a.m., [address omitted]
A man told police he had received a $2,450 check from Dial America Marketing with the agreement he would do bookkeeping for the business for $200 a week. The man said he was told to redistribute the funds by wiring the money to a Walmart in Texas, which he did. His bank later told him the check he received was fraudulent. The man lost a total of $2,450.

Feb 5, 2018
SCAM: 11:03 p.m., [address omitted]
Police responded after an employee at Burger King received a phone call from someone asking her where they keep the money and how much was in their safe. An officer took the phone and asked who he or she was speaking with. The caller promptly hung up. The employee who answered the phone said the caller claimed they were doing an FBI investigation for corporate and asked the employee to take money out of the safe and meet them nearby. The employee realized it was a scam and kept the caller on the phone until police arrived.

Feb 1, 2018
SCAM: 10:24 a.m., [address omitted]
A man told police he received an email on his OSU account regarding a job offer from a biotech company where he could earn $200 a week. The man said he received a check for $2,400, which he deposited into his bank account. He said he was asked to transfer $1,680 to someone in Texas via Western Union, at which point he realized it was a scam.

Jan 25, 2018
SCAM: 10 a.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported receiving messages from phone number 443-342-4190 stating her Social Security number had been stolen. She told police she called her mother, who called the number back and spoke to someone who said the Social Security number was being used by drug traffickers in Texas to send money to Mexico. The woman’s daughter called the people back and was advised to get all the money from her bank account, put it on Walmart gift cards and give the card numbers to them, which she did. The caller stated the money would be refunded to her the next day by a police officer. When that didn’t happen, she looked up the phone number and discovered it was a scam.

Jan 17, 2018
SCAM: 3:44 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman told police she accepted a job from a Craigslist post and was sent a check from an individual who identified himself as Taiwo Ayeni. The woman said she cashed the check and sent $850 via Western Union to her new employer's “supplier.” The woman said the employer then requested she buy several iTunes gift cards with the remainder of the money. The woman said that sounded odd and she contacted her bank, which informed her the check she deposited was not legitimate and she was most likely the victim of a scam. The woman said she sent a message to the original sender saying she was not sending anything to him. She said the posting on Craigslist has since been deleted.

Jan 12, 2018
SCAM: 2:22 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported receiving a phone call from a man who stated her identity had been stolen. The man told her to buy a $1,500 gift card from Target and provide the security code to him, which she did. She also gave the man the last four digits of her Social Security number, a picture of her and the name of her bank. The woman said the man spoke with an accent and called from the number 443-648-5751.

Jan 8, 2018
SCAM: 1:08 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported receiving a phone call from a man who identified himself as Benton County Sheriff's Deputy Cook at phone number 541-847-5100 (the Benton County Sheriff’s Office Monroe number). The man told her she had a "contact warrant" for missing jury duty and needed to pay her bail before getting off the phone with him or she would be arrested. The woman said she stayed on the phone with him while she drove to Safeway, purchased a $2,000 MoneyPack gift card and then drove to the Law Enforcement Center, where she provided him with the gift card number over the phone. The woman said the caller told her the gift card did not work and to purchase additional gift cards. She said she asked him to come out of the Law Enforcement Center and she would give him the physical card, and he disconnected the call. The woman then realized it was a scam and went inside to report it.

Dec 19, 2017
SCAM: 9:41 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman told police she received a call from 443-579-5816 and a man identifying himself as “Richard Gomez with the Federal Marshals” told her that her social security number was being cancelled due to pending criminal charges. The woman stated Gomez instructed her to take all the money out of her bank account and buy Walmart gift cards. The woman bought $2,675 worth of Walmart gift cards and provided Gomez with the pin number on the back of each card. Gomez told the woman the charges would be dropped and her social security number would be reactivated. Police have no suspects.

Dec 4, 2017
SCAM: 6:39 a.m., [address omitted]

A man reported he met a girl on the website Chatroulette about two years ago and began video chatting with her via Skype. The man said that on Sunday he received a message via Skype demanding $400 or the sender would disseminate explicit videos or photographs to the man’s Facebook friends. The sender requested the money be sent to the Philippines. No suspects were identified.

Dec 4, 2017
SCAM: 3:50 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported she had received a pop-up on her computer stating it was hacked and she needed to call 1-855-236-8222. She spoke with a man by the name of Ben Carter, who told her to write a check for $249.99, scan it and send it to him to remove the virus. The woman did so and later learned it was a scam.

Dec 1, 2017
SCAM: 2:15 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported she received a call from her boss informing her the Sheriff’s Office had called looking for her and to call them as soon as possible. She said she called the phone number given to her and was told she had two warrants for her arrest and she needed to go to the Sheriff's Office immediately to sign paperwork. She agreed to go to the Sheriff's Office and was told to bring a $500 gift card with her to pay a fine for which she would be reimbursed for if it turned out she did not have any warrants. She was instructed to get the card, which she did, and call them and give them the number on the card, which she also did. She was then told to go to the post office and mail the card to the USPS MCO Division, which she did, and then go to the Sheriff's Office. While at the Sheriff’s Office her husband called and informed her it was a scam.

Nov 27, 2017
SCAM: 9:46 a.m., [address omitted]
A man reported he had received a call in October from someone claiming to be Alex Williams with Apple Inc., who told him his computer was infected with a virus. The man said he agreed to pay about $3,000 in iTunes gift cards for two software packages to protect his computer. When the suspect asked for additional gift cards, the man became suspicious and called Apple and learned he had been scammed.

Nov 21, 2017
SCAM: 10:50 a.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported she had received a Facebook message from a friend telling her they had won $50,000 grants. The woman’s friend gave her a phone number and told her to call and ask for agent Paulsen Glenn. The woman said Glenn asked her to send a picture of her debit card and to buy $300 in iTunes gift cards, which she did. Her father learned what she was doing and told her it was a scam. The woman closed her bank accounts and is not out any money. Police spoke with the woman’s friend, who said she had not sent the Facebook messages. Police said her account appeared to be hacked.

Nov 21, 2017
SCAM: 12:16 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported she received an email on her OSU account indicating she was qualified for a job making $200 a week. The woman said she was sent a check for $2,450 and asked to send $2,100 back to the sender by Western Union. The woman sent the money and later realized the check was fraudulent.

Nov 4, 2017
SCAM: 9:43 a.m., [address omitted]
A man reported he had met a woman on the Plenty of Fish dating website and exchanging revealing photographs with her. The woman’s profile stated she was 23 years old. However, an unknown man called him stating he was the girl’s father and she was 16 years old. The “father” said he needed to pay him or he would go to police, so he put $60 on a prepaid card and gave the “father” the account and pin number. The man realized this was a scam after the “father” called again requesting more money.

Oct 19, 2017
SCAM: 12:02 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported her 15-year-old son had put $1,200 worth of camera equipment on Craigslist. A man named Hernandez Gago contacted them and offered to pay through PayPal if they would ship the camera equipment to New Jersey. They did so and found out the PayPal emails they were receiving were fake.

Oct 18, 2017
SCAM: 2:30 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported a man named Mark contacted her via phone and computer saying her bank account had been emptied. The man said he could get the money back for her if she sent him money. The woman withdrew $35,000 from her bank account and deposited it into various accounts at different banks that Mark instructed her to go to. An officer contacted Mark, but he would not answer questions and hung up the phone.

Oct 17, 2017
SCAM: 3:45 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported she had been contacted by a man who claimed to work for Wells Fargo and took the woman’s information. She later noticed $4,000 had been withdrawn from her account.

Oct 13, 2017
SCAM: 1:05 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported her husband planned to update their Garmin GPS device on the internet. However, he went onto a fake site and paid $180 to a man who pretended to be a Garmin technician. The couple verified with Garmin that they had fallen for a hoax.

Oct 11, 2017
SCAM: 3:30 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported she received a phone call from a man who identified himself as David New and told her she had won a 2017 Mercedes Benz. The man asked the woman to provide him credit card information to pay taxes on the car. The woman said she did not give the man any information.

Sept 27, 2017
SCAM: 3:45 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman reported she felt she was being scammed. She said she was contacted by a woman who identified herself as Kristen Anderson on Roommate Finder. After communicating for two weeks, Anderson sent the woman a check. But the check was written for $2,000 more than the agreed upon amount and Anderson asked the woman to wire back to her the extra money. Before wiring the money, the woman realized it might be a scam.

Sept 21, 2017
SCAM: 2:03 p.m., [address omitted]
A woman told police she thought her computer had been hacked after she found she had contacts she had not created. She said she was contacted by Microsoft, who told her they would resolve the issue and to buy iTunes gift cards to pay for the computer repair. The woman bought $700 worth of iTunes gift cards and provided them with the numbers. The woman told police the website "www.fastsupport.com" and the phone number 1-866-955-7984 were used during the scam. An officer called the phone number and spoke with someone but was not able to acquire tangible suspect information.

Sept 11, 2017
THEFT: 2:09 p.m., [address omitted]
A man reported he received a call from a man with an Indian accent claiming to be the federal police. The scammer told his victim that he filled out his admission paperwork to the University of Oregon incorrectly and had to either pay a fine or go to jail. The man agreed to pay the fine and was directed to purchase iTunes gift cards from Safeway and relay the relevant information over the phone. The man provided the scammer with $400 worth of iTunes gift cards. Police informed the man he had been scammed.

This was a sample taken from reported scams that have happened in Corvallis and the surrounding areas.. Again, I did not pick all of them, just a sample. There are thousands that happen in every city each year. These scams can range from an attempt to receive money from you, to stealing various account credentials, purchasing a service that doesn't exist, etc.


Yep, it was actually that long. Ridiculous, right?

These are my 12 ways to avoid scams:


1. The IRS will NEVER call you. Ever. They will send you snail mail, and that is all. If in doubt, call up your local Internal Revenue Service office (for all people in Benton County, there's one in Salem).

2. Never purchase gift-cards over the phone. Whether they say they're a lawyer, the Corvallis PD, or a "friend," they are not. Gift-cards are never a sufficient form of payment. I have, 100% of the time, see this result in scams. Also, shame on stores who don't ask someone why they're wanting to "buy $300 in iTunes gift cards". Never be guilt-tripped into purchasing them either. It is a scam.

3. Don't use Western Union/money orders to make payments. They are non-refundable. This includes if the person on the other end of the phone line will "send you a check for more than the amount and you wire-transfer the difference." This is the usual form that scammers request payment. They will send you a check, and you wire-transfer them the difference. The idea in and of itself doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but it is a popular scamming technique. Instead, ask them to wire you the money, and that you will wire back the difference. If they say "no," then you just foiled the scammer.

4. If you are "involved in an international crime in (a different country)," you are not. Verify with your local police department if you're unsure.

5. If you see a pop-up on your computer while you're browsing the internet that says you have a virus, there is a 99% chance you don't. Do not call the number on the screen. You can even call me, and I will walk you through how to get the pop-up to go away.

6. When making a purchase on either Craigslist or Facebook, first, meet a neutral site. Never meet at your residents. It's not only dangerous for you, but why would you want a stranger to know exactly where you live. Second, if you are purchasing electronics, meet at a local electronics store and have someone inspect it. I have inspected hundreds of computers when I was a hardware technician with an Apple Authorized Service Provider for people who were selling & buying machines. It's smart. Never accept checks; only cash or money order.

7. You don't win things over the phone. If you have actually won something on the phone in past, and it wasn't on the radio, that's why they do it now. That's why it's now a scam, because it's worked before, and the scammers hope it'll work again.

8. Don't exchange explicit photographs or videos over text, online chat, Skype, Snapchat, everything, even if it is a former girlfriend, boyfriend, lover. If your going to do it, do it in person. First, if it is someone you know and have met, and you put up explicit images or videos without their permission, you can be prosecuted under the "revenge porn" law, §166.065 of Oregon Revised Statutes for sexual harassment. If you don't know them, even more reason not to do it. You have no idea who's on the other end. Have you ever seen the show, Catfish?

9. Always be weary. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

10. Never be pressured to "act now." If someone tells you that if you turn off your computer, the "virus will spread," they are lying to you. Don't let anyone talk you into a purchase, especially if you are speaking to them because you called a number from a pop-up.

11. Be cautious on social media. There are many fake profiles in the wild, and one of the most common is for a profile to imitate someone who is over 70-years-old. I don't know why that's their target, but it is. If you get suspicious messages from family members or from someone else in your friends list, be cautious and don't click on any links. Never, ever click a link in a suspicious message OR email.

12. Don't trust your caller ID. Nowadays, scammers will spoof their phone number to make it look as if it's in your area. For example, in Corvallis you may receive a number with an area code 541 and the prefix 753, 754, or 757. All of these are common Corvallis prefixes with the appropriate area code. You may also receive phone calls from common cell phone numbers in your area. You can answer the phone, but be very aware and weary if the phone number is unknown to you. Lastly, don't purchase anything unless you've been expecting their call, and you've done your research to make sure it's reputable.

That's my list. Twelve ways to avoid scams. Can you still be scammed? Yes, it is possible, but if you follow these rules, it will reduce your chances ten-fold. Luckily, for the most parts, banks will issue refunds if you paid via credit card, and even if you didn't, it never hurts to ask. Always ask your bank for a refund if you've fallen victim to a scam.

If you follow these and still have doubts about an email, pop-up, or phone call you received, send me an email at stuart@crashsecurity.com or call/text at 541-714-5880. I would much rather have you send me a text to check, then to purchase $500 in gift-cards. 

Best of luck and safe browsing!

Why MacKeeper IS a Scam

Known Bad Software Part I - MacKeeper


Before starting, I need to thank Matt Jacobs (@pnwbeard - Primary Apple Authorized Mac Technician, Apple Certified iOS Technician, Apple Authorized Support Professional), Diego Munoz (@diegomunozmusic - Primary Apple Certified iOS Technician, Apple Authorized Mac Technician, Apple Authorized Support Professional), mac-interactive (@macinteractive - Operated company providing Apple Support since 2003, experience in maintaining large networks of Macs in enterprise environment), and MacFixer.co.uk (@TheMacFixer - provides computer support, hardware repair, maintenance and upgrades for Apple Macintosh and iOS users in Hampshire, Isle of Wight, Wiltshire, Berkshire, Surrey and West Sussex for on-site repairs/collections) for their contributions to this blog post. Their knowledge and assistance over the years have made this possible. Give them a follow on Twitter as a thank you! Thank you very much for your contributions!

Let's begin...

Known Bad Software (KBS), or sometimes referred to as Potentially Unwanted Programs (PUPs) are on the rise. As PUPs seems like a "politically correct" term to call these programs, I'm going to call a spade a spade. Welcome to Part 1 of a multipart series focusing on Known Bad Software. Our first software, the well-known, persistent piece of garbage, MacKeeper.

My   Badge of Honor

My Badge of Honor

As most of you know, I have never been a fan of the software MacKeeper. In fact, I have been undoubtedly critical of them, enough to have them block me on Twitter. A fellow computer technician, @mac-interactive, took a screenshot of the message saying "MacKeeper has blocked you" and referred to it as the 'Badge of Honor'. I of course concur. 

I wanted to write a post that chronicles the reasoning behind my hatred. I also want to talk about specific articles that praise MacKeeper, and touch on why I still believe it is garbage.

History: I want to start with a little history of MacKeeper, and the two companies that have owned it since its inception in March 2010.

MacKeeper was started by ZeoBIT, LLC, out of Sunnyvale, California. MacKeeper, and as most programs, started out slow before gaining speed in the computer "security" industry. The way it gained speed, however, is part of the reason that MacKeeper is so highly criticized.

In 2014, Holly Yecha filed a class-action lawsuit against MacKeeper's, at the time, former owner, ZeoBIT, LLC, claiming that the company's computer security program identifies problems that don't exist and generates false error messages to scare users into purchasing an upgrade. (see Holly Yencha, et al. v. ZeoBIT LLC, Case No. 2:13-cv-00578, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania). The lawsuit was settled, and I am ommitting a lot of the legal jargon, but ZeoBIT settled for $2 million and told customers they could get a refund if MacKeeper was purchased before 8 July, 2015. A win for the people!

As of December 6, 2016, ZeoBIT, LLC is no longer in operation, but not before they sold MacKeeper to Kromtech Alliance Corp. in April, 2013. Keep in mind, this is before the class-action lawsuit against ZeoBIT, LLC, which I believe is the reason ZeoBIT went under. It is, I think, an accurate guess to think that ZeoBIT, LLC simply rebranded as Kromtech Alliance Corp.

Kromtech is known for its shady marketing techniques, which many users claim try to scare the user into buying their software. This is similar to how ZeoBIT, LLC operated.

https://mackeeper.com/blog/post/5-avira-licenses-anti-virus-technology-to-kromtech-to-power-mackeeper-security

https://mackeeper.com/blog/post/5-avira-licenses-anti-virus-technology-to-kromtech-to-power-mackeeper-security

In June 2014, Kromtech partnered with Avira, a well known antivirus software, to integrate the Avira database technology into MacKeeper. ZeoBIT did the same in 2011. The licensing agreement, which you can even see when your installing MacKeeper, allows Avira's Secure Antivirus API to run as a background service, which can also take requests from MacKeeper to run scans.

Now keep in mind, there is a difference between Kromtech Security Center, and the software Kromtech is putting on the market. Kromtech Security Center has done some great work in security research. I just wish Kromtech put a little more effort into their poor excuse for their security software.

How I learned about MacKeeper: I was first introduced to MacKeeper in 2015. I had recently began my work as a technician with an AASP (Apple Authorized Service Provider). I was being trained by Matt Jacobs, who had been with the company for a little over two years at the time. This was about the time when MacKeeper was starting to gain some notoriety in the Apple community as being a piece of software that should be avoided.

I remember one of my first days of training: I had a yellow legal pad out, taking notes on what was referred to as the "Security Bundle," a suite of programs and processes designed to help customers that were having security issues. A piece of this was removing programs that at the time, were known by the acronym KBS, for Known Bad Software, a phrase and acronym coined by Matt. It was Matt's knowledge and experienced that really sparked my interest into the world of computer security, and more specifically, Mac Security.

mavericks-600x409.png

"It all started with (OS X 10.9) Mavericks, which also seemed to open the door to malware," Matt told me. "I was running a 'tune-up' on a customer's machine (in 2013) that was running slower than it should. When I was working through my normal process of running a tune-up, MacKeeper crashed and asked if I wanted it to reopen. As I was just running a tune-up, I didn't think it was necessary to have it open. Right after I told it to not to reopen, the machine sped up to the speed it should be running. Not realizing MacKeeper was actually bad software, I thought it was a bad installation of the program, so I went out and installed it again. Sure enough, once it started running, the whole machine started running slow again."

After a lot of research, and going down the rabbit hole of Google, Matt discovered from a reputable source within the Apple Discussion Forums, that you (users) should stay away from MacKeeper. Matt fired off an email to Thomas Reed, at the time the creator of Adware Medic and owner/blogger on The Safe Mac website, now with Malwarebytes. Shortly after, a blog post by Reed went up on The Safe Mac, and MacKeeper began it's downfall in the eyes of the Apple community. "I don't know if my email to Thomas (Reed) had anything to do with his blog post, but I like to think it was," Matt stated.

It was after my training with Matt that triggered my love for investigating these types of poorly designed, unwanted programs.

From left to right: Stuart Ashenbrenner, Diego Munoz, Matt Jacobs

From left to right: Stuart Ashenbrenner, Diego Munoz, Matt Jacobs

When I was initially hired, I was being hired as Matt's replacement, as he and his family were moving. Roughly nine months later, Matt returned, and our store was also fortunate enough to get Diego Munoz, around a month before Matt came back. The three of us quickly became very close friends, and we worked very diligently on Matt's Security Bundle, Matt spearheading it. We were identified as Simply Mac's Research & Development team a short time later for the Security Bundle that went company-wide the following year, which I confirmed yesterday is still in use, and I just need to say this, Matt Jacobs has yet to get any credit for the production of this software, which is an abomination by that company. In our off-hours, we would test programs, run adware and see what it did and how it persisted, and worked to refine the Security Bundle to be as efficient as possible. The Security Bundle is still ran within the company, but the R & D team has mostly been disbanded with the massive customer increase, as well as some Apple Repair Extension Programs, that have kept Matt and Diego extremely busy, leaving little to no time to work on research and development. Even though I've left the company, I still spend my free time and time with Crash Security researching malware, adware, and known bad software like MacKeeper, so I can bring you blogs like this one.

Mac expert mac-interactive dug through some old emails, and he found the first surfacing of MacKeeper in his inbox from 30 November 2011. His email was sent out to his coworkers. It said, "Just had an email from a friend saying they had 'installed MacKeeper'...followed by 'is it any good? (...I removed some content for brevity...) Do [sic] the team have an experience? I would stay away from the app purely because of its excessive banner advertising and the fact that the banner click downloads the package!" Package is referring to MacKeeper's installer. 'Package' is the technical term for a type of installer. The response to mac-interactive was in the affirmative, telling him to stay away from it.

One of mac-interactive's coworkers stated at the time, "The client had carried out a 'clean up' operation using the application (MacKeeper), and it deleted a lot of their files from the Library folder in their home directory and also complete applications like 'iPhoto' and 'Pages'. A total of 2 hours has been spent getting the client's iMac up and running again. I talked the client through the reinstallation of Mac OS X 10.6 from their DVD which restored most functions. Then the client decided to purchase, download and install the latest version of Mac OS X (10.8), iPhoto and Pages applications from the App Store as they weren't sure where their original installation disks were and they wanted to be up to date.

The application, as I suspected was 'MacKeeper'. It's an app that appears a lot in 'Speed Up Your Mac' (advertisements) all over the internet.

This is a bad application in my opinion, and I generally uninstall it as soon as I find it on client's computers. Some versions of this application have been VERY difficult to remove in the past."

dwightschrute_false_mac-300x207-300x205.jpg

MacKeeper's problems: First, they provide cleaning software, which they claim you need, and they claim that they are criticized on forums because the people on the forms don't understand this and still believe Macs don't get viruses. Let's address this: NO! Many people who criticize MacKeeper on forums and discussion boards are actually security or Mac professionals. I believe that Macs need malware protection, which is sometimes bundled with an antivirus program. I think it is necessary. Macs are getting targeted for malware more and more every day. The idea that "Macs can't get viruses" just isn't true anymore, which prior to OS X 10.9 Mavericks was actually a valid statement. Actually, the phrase should have said, "Macs haven't gotten viruses." The ad campaign that Apple put out years ago is now irrelevant, except for the fact that the majority of Mac users truly believe that Macs can't get a virus, malware, adware, anything. What this does is makes them extremely vulnerable, and in-turn, they click on anything, believing that there is no way it can be malicious. However, malware protection is COMPLETELY, 100% different than "cleaning" software, which claims to "free up RAM space", yada yada yada.

Now for my favorite part...why do I, personally, have such hatred for MacKeeper? Now keep in mind, I am one of many who hate this software. I asked Diego Munoz, why he thought MacKeeper was so reviled. Munoz says, "I think most people who revile it are somewhat tech savvy and know how different computer processes work and they can see how "sketchy" they are."

Marketing: Beginning with their marketing tactics, MacKeeper is supremely one of the most aggressive advertisers that I've come across online. Their ads are predominantly on pages that are uncommon to the average user, but occasionally, you will see them on CNN[dot]com or other popular sites.. You will see their banner ads splattered across common pirating or torrenting pages, any page that speaks about computer speed, and the strangest - on the pages of other "security" software like CleanMyMac. Speedtest.net, a well known webpage for testing the upload and download time of your internet runs MacKeeper ads, and I have yet to run across a computer that is running MacKeeper and is benefiting from it. When I asked Diego about why he thinks it gets installed, he replied, "I think it's a guilt trip scam, and 100% of the computers I've worked on have not benefited from this. In fact, 100% of them do better without it."

Screen Shot 2018-05-08 at 8.46.58 AM.png

MacKeeper has been everywhere as far as marketing is concerned. Part, if not all of this, is made possible by CJ Affiliate, formerly Commission Junction, who is owned by Alliance Data. CJ Affiliate is a site that allows you to publish advertisements to target a specific audience. Based on how many 'clicks' your links get, you "stock" goes up, meaning that affiliates can turn a higher profit per click. Let me give you an example...if I use CJ Affiliate, MacKeeper can run an ad on my site, potentially. For ever click from my website to MacKeeper's site, I would give a certain amount of kickback money from that. Furthermore, if someone goes on to MacKeeper's site and buys something after visiting from my link, I get a kickback from that as well. Because of this, MacKeeper is on a TON of websites, because it is easy money for businesses, as they are getting a kickback off each click. The thing about MacKeeper that pushes this forward is that fact that MacKeeper sure does look legitimate. I will give them that. There website and software look as if they will actually help, which I don't think they do. I, as Diego mention, believe that removing it is more beneficial.

Fake Advertisements: MacKeeper has even been known, in the past, to also produce fake advertisements, trying to get the user to click on them. MacKeeper claims this is due to competitors trying to deface the company, but the following still remain. MacKeeper has been so well noted as being a piece of Known Bad Software, that some highly touted antivirus engines actually recognize MacKeeper as, not necessarily a piece of malware, but as a PUP, and the antivirus will help you remove it.

Macfixer.co.uk told me, "I think the selling tactics give it away, any legitimate software would not use pop-under ads telling people they needed to clean their Macs by scaring them. They also make it difficult to uninstall and even if you follow the guides on-line various crap is left remaining. So whilst the only harm it may do is to slow down your system and bundle a number of very poor ‘utilities’, ultimately its the shoddy business tactics that mean I tell all and sundry to avoid it. I’ve had dozens of cases where a poorly running Mac is restored to full health after MacKeeper has been given the boot."

I digress momentarily to say this: many antivirus programs make your Mac slower, especially the big ones that you heard of from the Windows platform. Antivirus software like Norton, Sophos (not as much), Avast, McAfee, AVG, and Kaspersky seem to slow a Mac down rather drastically. The difference with MacKeeper is that it repeatedly tells you that "your system is at risk," and that you should update MacKeeper to the Premium version, of course at a cost.

They claim their software can clean your memory, to name just one. You don't need a program to "clean your memory." It may remove the 200MB from your Safari cache, but 200MB on a hard drive over the size of 128GB is so minute, it's ridiculous to market towards people in this fashion.

Fake Reviews: One of the issues I have seen is the false advertising by people claiming to be Mac experts, lobbying for MacKeeper. To give you an example, I found macsumo[dot]com, a website that contains the word "mac," which also makes Apple users more trustworthy of them. Macsumo has only four articles, but unfortunately, the website lands on one of the first pages of a "MacKeeper" web search.

Macsumo[dot]com's most recent article posted on 3 April 2018, titled Mackeeper Review (April 2018) – Testing The World’s Most Controversial Mac App leads off with an interesting question. "First things first, do you really need cleaning tools like Mackeeper?" they ask. Their answer...Yes, you do!?!?! This is a flat-out falsehood. You don't need "cleaning tools." Do you need malware tools? Yes, I think so, but cleaning tools, no. Macsumo also claimed it sped up their machine, which would be a first. The most bizarre part of this blog post was the fact that one-eighth of the way into the article, they offer an "Exclusive MacKeeper discount", claiming "Macsumo exclusive 20% discount link." These ads then are scattered throughout the ENTIRE article, and by entire, I mean there are six in total. Yet, when you follow the link, you get to the purchase page for MacKeeper. No discount, just their primary purchase page. So much of the "advertising" from MacKeeper, in these forms, is simply clickbait (an ad designed to just make you click it). If you think about it, MacKeeper not only makes money on their product, but they make money on page hits, so if they put ads that convince consumers that their computer is running slow, then user clicks on it, and MacKeeper can then tell potential advertising clients that their pages get x-amount of hits per day. Still, there was a funny aspect to macsumo[dot]com: 1.) Their Terms of Service, which contain the "Links" section. See the picture below to see what I mean.

Macsumo[dot]com Terms of §6

Macsumo[dot]com Terms of §6

2.) The amount of CPU usage my computer was using simply having their website loaded. Pictured below - a whopping 95%

Screen Shot 2018-04-19 at 4.51.54 PM.png

Leave it to a lobbyist for MacKeeper to have high CPU usage...

A big question regarding if MacKeeper is a scam is still lingering. To use the definition of a scam directly from the dictionary:


scam

noun

informal

1. 

a dishonest scheme; a fraud.

"an insurance scam"

synonyms:fraud, swindle, fraudulent scheme, racket, trick; More

verb

1. 

swindle.

"a guy that scams the elderly out of their savings"

synonyms:swindle, cheat, deceive, trick, dupe, hoodwink, double-cross, gull;


IMG_4837.png

If those are the definitions of a scam, then MacKeeper is most definitely a scam. "Deceive": MacKeeper claims your computer is at high-risk when it is not. It seems ridiculous that a company that many find trustworthy is still in operation.

Now I do differ with some of my colleagues in this belief. People like mac-interactive said, "I think it has been a scam in it’s history, but now they seemed to have morphed into a general support service.
An example of a point in history of when it definitely was a scam can be seen in the September 2011 Apple Help Writer article (since updated) and here: http://applehelpwriter.com/2011/09/21/how-to-uninstall-mackeeper-malware/. A fake scan window that claims that the (clean system) is in a SERIOUS condition."

The other thing I have found that MacKeeper does to deceive its customers is constantly touting their 5-star rating from shopperapproved[dot]com. Here is one of the 5-star reviews. Read the review carefully. It doesn't seem like a 5-star review to me.

The website shopperapproved[dot]com is a site in and of itself that is questionable. In its first 12 days online, it had over 1,000 reviews, which sounds fishy to me. Also, according to TrustPilot, ShopperApproved[dot]com has a trust-rating of 3.4/10, basically meaning you shouldn't trust it.

Deception in Support: The funniest thing MacKeeper does, is it only speaks to its reviews from this site, but you have to dig to find their negative reviews, which there are a ton of them.

Screen Shot 2018-05-07 at 7.45.59 PM.png
Screen Shot 2016-06-17 at 8.09.21 PM.png

Again, their deception is almost staggering into wanting to make you believe that everything they do is 5-star service, and every customer representative you chat with through MacKeeper is the most Apple-savvy technician you could possibly find. Yet, every time I have chatted with someone on MacKeeper, which is well over twenty times, I have always "chatted" with the same representative, Andrew, or according to MacKeeper's website, Andrii (above-left). They have only FIVE customer support staff members, all who are, according to MacKeeper's website, "Apple Certified Professionals,"  which is their equivalent to the Apple Certified Support Professional, which is an actual accreditation through Apple. Yet, when you look at each profile, four of the members are only certified through OS X 10.9 Mavericks (circled in the picture above), which came out in October 2013. One member is certified with OS X 10.10 Yosemite, released in June 2014. We are currently on macOS 10.13 High Sierra, and it's 2018!

They will walk you through your system scan, then tell you, "Your system is at critical risk," which is a direct quote from a chat log I had with them. This was after installing MacKeeper on a fresh operating system, meaning that I erased a hard drive, installed an operating system, installed MacKeeper, and ran their scan. They said my newly installed operating system was at "Serious" status. Below you can see a video-only beginning interaction which they claim is a chat with a real person. It's not. It's 100% auto-generated text. They are auto-responses, just one message after another, which you can see below (no audio).

IMG_4838.jpg

This type of "support" leads to reviews like the this review. One of the more bizarre parts is that I have installed MacKeeper probably over one-hundred times to experiment with it, have chats with their "technicians," etc. Yet over all this time, I have never ONCE been asked to review the software. Even if you go to shopperapproved[dot]com, you can't just leave a review for something. I still have no idea how those reviews appear, but mac-interactive believes that once a purchase is made, the customer is sent a specific link to leave a review.

One of the most difficult parts is finding positive MacKeeper reviews that aren't from shopperapproved[dot]com. When you type it into an internet search, you get some options, but then you stumble across an ad, yes an ad, that is for "MacKeeper reviews." The link to it? It goes to MacKeeper's website! I couldn't believe this. Do you know what this means? It basically means that MacKeeper is paying for an ad that claims it has MacKeeper reviews and it goes directly to their site. The advertisement on Google below and left leads to the page below and on the right. It is absolutely reprehensible. One of the funniest parts, MacKeeper's ad gave them only 4.1 out of 5 stars 😂😂😂.

Screen Shot 2018-04-28 at 3.58.12 PM.png

There have been some reviews left over the years from well-known website. In 2014, a company/website called 9to5Mac said, "Buying MacKeeper is basically paying to get scammed everyday."

Screen Shot 2018-04-28 at 3.58.47 PM.png

Likewise, two years prior, CultOfMac.com noted, "MacKeeper uses hidden "activators" which download malware without the user's consent."

Even people who write positive reviews of MacKeeper on their webpages, like macsumo[dot]com almost always have advertisements for MacKeeper on their website. If I am going to give an honest review about a product, I probably shouldn't be running their advertisements too. Isn't that exactly what a conflict of interest is? But this goes back to the CJ Affiliate part of it; getting paid for clicks.

MacKeeper is so bad at having their content reviewed, that their own Youtube channel put up this video, saying it was a review of MacKeeper. By the way, noticed how it says "Shopper Approved" in the title. They claimed this video was her testimonial. 

This shows your what a mess MacKeeper is. If this is their types of reviews, then you can tell they are a fledgling operation. That is, if their reviews are even legitimate, which I highly doubt.

Blatant Lies: One of the things that companies similar MacKeeper purport is that if you use free antivirus or malware software and don't pay for it, that you yourself become the product. Now I realize that on occasion, this holds true. The idea of "too good to be true" can be accurate in many circumstances when you are talking about computers. However, until recently, Malwarebytes for Mac was 100% free, and it still is free but contains a paid option. ClamXAV, one of my favorite virus-scanners was free until approximately a year ago. EVERY tool created by Patrick Wardle (@patrickwardle) on his website, Objective-See.com (@objective-see) is free, and they are amazing tools that are perfect for anyone concerned about computer security or information security. Please let me know if you are interested in any of these, and I can give you more information.

IMG_5498.PNG

Apple's Faux pas: As much as I would like to place 100% of the blame directly on MacKeeper's shoulders, you simply can't without calling out Apple simultaneously. Apple has, for seven years, allowed ZeoBIT, LLC, followed by Kromtech Alliance Corp., to carry a valid, signed certificate, meaning that Apple is allowing MacKeeper to be produced for their machines. Apple even once called out MacKeeper on the Apple Support Twitter account, claiming MacKeeper to be malware in January of 2018. Unfortunately, this tweet has since been removed, which is a shame. It felt like a momentary win for Apple, only for them to most likely kowtow to MacKeeper threats.

According to mac-interactive, "It did exist on the App Store for a while as the 911 Bundle, which was a great shame." I did confirm this in only a few seconds of research. If Apple could be more upfront with the terrible software that is out there, we may be able to curb this problem.

Final Thoughts: The problem is that there are also garbage pieces of software that not only don't help your computer, they seem to actually make it worse. There are a surprising number of these, and unfortunately, most of the ones you may see in the App Store aren't good. I highly suggest doing some research before downloading any antivirus or malware protection, and even ask me if you would like.

Lastly, I'd like to leave you with my own review of MacKeeper, and yes, it is SHOPPER APPROVED! Enjoy!