Selling Your Personal Data

Not long ago, I wrote an article about virtual kidnapping and how to avoid it. In that post, I talked about making your Facebook and Instagram profiles “Private,” so random strangers cannot look at all of your personal information (family members, where you are, what you like/dislike, political views, etc.). I did, however, not speak about the overarching reason why I find this so important. Let’s start with this…your personal data should be yours. Yes, it should be. Even though you’re voluntarily giving Facebook or Instagram your information, which you agree to do in the Terms of Agreement, this monopoly of Facebook and other analytics companies (e.g. Cambridge Analytica), are able to build full profiles on you. These profiles stretch way beyond your date of birth, preferred pronouns, or a few pictures.

These companies create comprehensive data points about you that relate to your likes and dislike, and connects you to your fellow humans. Think of it this way - you are represented by a node (a small dot on a large piece of paper). You like basketball. I like basketball. An edge (or line) connects the two of us together due to our shared interest of basketball. You can see in the sample below that the nodes are denoted by Twitter accounts; the edges by retweets. Now this is a very minor example, but when we blow this up to a large scale and add millions of people, we start to see patterns arise. Through these patterns, companies can then create algorithms to target certain groups of people. Here is a quick example for you - this graph below, created with a piece of software called Graphistry, was created by scraping (gathering) Twitter tweets over a specific point in time. What this is directly referencing is the #FalseFlag narrative that surrounded the Christchurch Mosque shooting. This graph was compiled by @JessBots on twitter. It's a brilliant account that I highly recommend.

giphy.gif

Have you ever thought, I really should purchase ‘x’, or I want to buy ‘y’, then the next day you see an advertisement specifically for that product? Isn’t it creepy? It’s creepy enough when you search for something via Google, then that product starts showing up in your Amazon suggestions, but when you have mere thoughts of something, then that product starts showing up, it becomes incredibly disturbing. What causes this? As far as I know, it’s not Alexa or Siri listening to you, although I cannot guarantee that. It’s actually because these algorithms are so good, that they predict human thought and behavior. Now this is not something that the majority of the populous can wrap their mind around - the fact that a machine can predict our behavior, but I know for a fact that it is happening.

It’s easy to see how it’s happening as well - everything we’re posting or saying online is being queried and added to a giant database that is connecting each and every one of us. Companies are easily able to do this with their Terms of Service. For example, let’s look at Instagram’s Data Policy on what kind of information they collect:

instagram_datapolicy.png

The amount of information that you are allowing them to collect is astronomical. The other issue, Instagram is owned by Facebook. That's even more data-points in one spots, but as Facebook sells your information to companies like Cambridge Analytica (CA), we see these data points get connected evermore. A New York Professor, David Carroll, filed a legal claim against CA last year, requesting all of the information they had on him. They did not comply, so Carroll is left in the dark. If CA had nothing to hide, whey not turn over the material.

We've all heard of Cambridge Analytica by now, the company that filed bankruptcy to supposedly duck from having to turn over all of their information to authorities. CA helped provide data for the Trump campaign in 2016. This is simply a fact, not some type of political statement. They also assisted with both Obama campaigns.

download.jpg

During the 2016 Presidential Election, Trump's digital media director, Brad Parscale, launched an online campaign which was budgeted at $100 million. In the end, he spent just over $12 million, while the Clinton camp spent less than $4 million, and most of those were on Politico and the NY Times. With this information, it’s easier to see why he won. They used microtargeting to target small, specific groups of people with the "Lock Her Up" campaign, “Build The Wall” (and “Mexico is going to pay for it”) which was built on the premise that there are more illegal immigrants flooding the border than ever before, which is false, and the “Muslim Ban,” claiming all Muslims are terrorists. It also was so viral that even the right wing majority leader at the time, Donald Trump, started using it in speeches.

Parscale was named as the digital media director for Trump's 2020 bid as of February 27, 2018, and he has supposedly already stashed away $7 million for the reelection.


That all being said, here is what I think we have in store. As we share more and more information online, we are giving the rich and powerful, the top 1% of the top 1%, more ways to target us. Again, if this doesn’t bother you, then more power to you (or less in the grand scheme of things). I just think that elections shouldn’t be determined by what people share on social media. They shouldn’t be determined on smear campaigns that target ads at the disenfranchised and uninformed.

I truly believe that if the Democrats want to pull a 2020 victory, they are going to have to go toe-to-toe with Trump, not just in their digital campaign but in debates as well. With so many candidates in the field for the left, they need to find one that can actually take on Trump, and not get run over by his belligerent behavior. It won’t be Pete Buttigieg, and definitely won’t be the slowly-going-insane Joe Biden.

I know I’ve completely deviated from “your private information,” however, this private information is being used against yourself and your fellow American’s in, what is equivalent to, rigged elections.

We need to be cognoscente about what we put on our social media profiles. Be weary of advertisements and don’t take everything for fact. Always, always assume that what you’re looking at is actually “fake news.” Not the kind that twists stories to fit a narrative or bias (Fox News, MSNBC, etc.), but the legitimate kind of fake news - the news that is actually not true at all.

Moving forward, all we can do is take back the data that is rightfully ours. I deleted my Facebook in early 2019, and I haven’t looked back. For about a week, I missed being able to check it, but overall, it has separated me from the drama that so easily runs rampant on Facebook. I enjoy Twitter for the connections in my industry and hobbies, and I love Instagram for being able to see other people’s photos (family pictures, friends, etc). I do, however, keep my Instagram on the Private setting.

It’s no longer a matter of if big-tech is selling your information, it’s just how. What can you do? Keep your information private. Don’t put anything on the internet that you wouldn’t be comfortable with the entire world knowing, including your parents & grandparents. Please, pretty please, for the sake of your children - make your profiles private. Don’t give these companies any more of your private information. Be weary about what you put online. It has a legitimate impact on this country and your future.